Card #1647 · GitHub Marketplace
Lack of native PR review metrics and real-time visibility
GitHub lacks native tools to track PR review distribution, response times, and workload balance across teams. There is also a significant gap in real-time visibility for tracking the current state of open PRs at a board level.
Pain score
0.60/ 1.00 · weighted product of four components
Reach0.63distinct authors (log-normalized)
Recency0.65freshness decay, half-life months
Engagement0.72upvotes + comments, normalized
Monetization0.50willingness-to-pay cues in evidence
§ Evidence — 3 verified quotes
there's no native way to see who's actually doing the reviewing, how fast they respond, or how evenly the review workload is distributed across the team.
GitHub doesn't give you a board-level view of this at all. You have to open each PR individually or parse the list view and infer it.
The third-party tools that fill this gap are either ridiculously overpriced for what they do
Comments are a Pro feature — join the conversation, share what you've shipped, hear what others are building.
Upgrade to Pro