Card #2190 · Clio App Directory
Inefficient redlining and document revision workflows
Lawyers struggle with inefficient ways of handling document changes and redlines. Some users find it frustrating when opposing counsel uses comments to request rejections instead of making actual edits, while others use this method to maintain document integrity and force the other party to clean up non-material edits.
Pain score
0.52/ 1.00 · weighted product of four components
Reach0.40distinct authors (log-normalized)
Recency0.75freshness decay, half-life months
Engagement0.86upvotes + comments, normalized
Monetization0.50willingness-to-pay cues in evidence
§ Evidence — 3 verified quotes
If you don't want to accept the changes I made, why would you not strike or revert those changes, instead of just including a side comment saying "Reject changes".
You've now made life twice as hard not just for me, but for both of the commercial teams trying to review the redlines.
So instead, I just comment bubble each of your wordsmithing edits. That way, you have to clean up your own mess, and we retain document integrity.
Comments are a Pro feature — join the conversation, share what you've shipped, hear what others are building.
Upgrade to Pro